Light Therapy Improves Arthritis Dramatically

Arthritis is the leading cause of disability, characterised by recurrent pain from inflammation in one or more joints of the body. While arthritis has various forms and is typically associated with the elderly, it can actually affect anyone, regardless of age or gender. Can light be used effectively for treatment of some or all types arthritis?

Contents

Introduction & Video
Arthritis Light Therapy evidence
Mechanism of action
Ideal source of light
Treatment times for joints/devices
Summary
References

Introduction

Infrared and red light have actually been used clinically for the treatment of arthritis since the late 1980s. By the year 2000, enough scientific evidence existed to recommend it for all arthritis sufferers1 regardless of cause or severity. Since then there have been several hundred quality clinical studies trying to refine the parameters for all joints that can be affected. The effectiveness can be quite profound in some people, as this news report shows:

As of this year, light therapy is regarded not only as a reliable treatment for the pain of arthritis, but actually as a healing and preventative tool against the root causes of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and various other inflammatory joint issues. The implications of light on arthritis should come as no surprise, as pain relief and accelerated healing are the most well proven effects of light therapy. This is true not just for joint issues, but actually most pain, inflammation and damage anywhere on the body.


Light therapy proven to help treat arthritis

The first major symptom of arthritis is pain, often excruciating and debilitating as the condition progresses. This is the first way in which light therapy can help – by quickly reducing the inflammation in the joint and thus reducing the pain, often immediately. Practically all areas have been studied in human clinical trials including on; the knees5-12, 33, shoulders15,38, jaw26,27,36,37, fingers/hands/wrists14,15,40, back34,35, elbows, neck17,29 and ankles/feet/toes.

infrared light device used for knee arthritis
Infrared light device being used for knee arthritis

The knees seem to be the most well studied joint in humans, which is understandable considering it is perhaps the most commonly affected area. Arthritis of any type here has serious implications like disability and inability to walk. Fortunately most studies using red/IR light on the knee joint show significantly positive effects, and this is true over a wide range of energy doses. Fingers, toes, hands and wrists appear to be the most easy to treat of all arthritic problems, due to their relatively small size and shallow depth – even smaller doses of visible red light can be effective here.

Red Light Device Mini being used for finger arthritis
Red Light Device Mini being used for finger arthritis

Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis are the major types of arthritis being studied, due to their prevalence, although there is reason to believe the same treatment works on other types of arthritis (and even unrelated joint problems such as injury or post-surgery) such as psoriatic, gout and even juvenile arthritis. Treatments for osteoarthritis tend to involve direct application of light over the affected area. Successful treatments for rheumatoid arthritis can be the same but some also involve application of light to the blood18,19,21. As rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune condition this makes sense – the joints are just the symptom, the actual root problem is in the immune cells. In fact red light is proven to help with a whole host of other autoimmune issues (see hypothyroidism light therapy).


The mechanism – why red/infrared light helps arthritis

Before we can understand why red/IR light helps arthritis, we need to know what causes arthritis.

Causes

Arthritis can be the result of chronic inflammation of a joint, but can also develop suddenly, after periods of stress or injury (not necessarily injury to the arthritic area). Usually the body is able to repair the daily wear and tear on joints, but can lose this ability, leading to the onset of arthritis.

  • A reduction in oxidative metabolism, the ability to convert glucose/carbohydrates into energy is linked strongly to arthritis.
    • Clinical hypothyroidism is frequently associated with arthritis30, with both often diagnosed around the same time.
    • More recent studies have shown more details of the metabolic defect in glucose metabolism is linked to rheumatoid arthritis (http://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/09/16/important-metabolic-defect-identified-in-immune-cells-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/)
  • There’s a definite hormonal link to most types of arthritis
    • This is shown by how becoming pregnant can completely clear up (or at least change) arthritic symptoms in some women.
    • Rheumatoid arthritis is also 3+ times more frequent in women than in men (and harder to women to cure), further confirming the hormonal link.
    • Adrenal hormones (or lack thereof) have also been linked to all arthritis for over 100 years now20.
    • Changes in liver health/function are strongly linked to rheumatoid arthritis
  • Calcium deficiency is also linked to arthritis, along with various other nutrient deficiencies.
    • In fact, abnormal calcium metabolism is present in all types of arthritis.

The list of causes goes on, with many factors potentially playing a role. While the exact cause of arthritis is still debated in general (and different for osteo / rheumatoid etc.), it’s obvious there is some connection to lowered energy production and the downstream effect that has on the body, eventually leading to the joint inflammation.

Early treatment of arthritis with ATP (the cellular energy metabolism product) had positive results20, and this is the same energy molecule that red/IR light therapy helps our cells to produce….

Mechanism

Red and infrared wavelengths of light between 600nm and 1000nm are absorbed by our cells39, increasing natural energy (ATP) production. This process is termed ‘photobiomodulation’ by researchers in the field. Specifically we see an increase in mitochondrial products such as ATP, NADH, and even co2 – the normal result of a healthy, unstressed metabolism.

The fact that red and infrared light increases energy production is just that – a proven fact. It even seems that our bodies have evolved to be penetrated by, and usefully absorb, this type of light. The controversial part of the mechanism is the specific chain of events on the molecular level, of which there are several hypotheses:

  • Nitric oxide (NO) is released from cells during light therapy. This is a stress molecule that inhibits respiration, so sending it out of the cells is a good thing. The specific idea is that red/IR light is dissociating NO from cytochrome c oxidase in the mitochondria, thus allowing oxygen to be processed again.
    • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are released in small amounts after light therapy. This also seems to give beneficial effects.
    • Vasodilation is stimulated by red/IR light therapy – something related to NO and very significant for joint inflammation and arthritis.
  • Red/IR light also has an effect on (cellular) water, increasing the distance between each water molecule. What this means is the physical properties of a cell change – reactions happen more smoothly, enzymes and proteins have less resistance, diffusion is better. This is inside cells but also in the blood and other intercellular spaces. Basically red light improves general function of the whole organism.

Much of life (on the cellular level) is not yet understood and red/IR light seems to be fundamental to life in some way, much more so than many other colours/wavelengths of light. Based on the evidence, it seems likely that both of the above hypotheses are happening, and probably other as yet unknown mechanisms too.

There is plenty of evidence of a broader systemic effect from irradiating veins and arteries anywhere on the body, plus increased blood flow/microcirculation and reduced inflammation locally. The bottom line is that red/IR light helps your cells to function optimally again – and the cells of the joints are no different in this.


Ideal light device for arthritis light therapy

Infrared light mini used on the big toe
The ideal light design depends on a number of things – including the area being treated. In this image we have the big toe joint being treated with the infrared light device mini

So what should we look for in a light therapy device for treating arthritis? Most studies use lasers and while clinics offering laser therapy are one option for treatment, they are expensive and inconvenient. Going out to the clinic isn’t always easy if suffering from severe joint pain and for the average person it’s not realistic to buy the laser devices themselves (for home use) as are more expensive than most modern cars. LED light therapy is a practical and proven alternative – affordable enough to use at home, is considered equal in effect to lasers31,32 and has also been studied extensively for arthritis.

Red or Infrared?

The main difference between red (600-700nm) and infrared (700-100nm) light seems to be the depth to which they can penetrate, with wavelengths higher than 800nm penetrating better than wavelengths under 700nm – and this has practical implications for arthritis. A low power red light may be very effective for arthritis of the hands and feet, but it could fall short for arthritis of the knees, shoulders and bigger joints. The majority of arthritis light therapy studies use infrared wavelengths for this very reason and the studies comparing red and infrared wavelengths show better results from the infrared. So an infrared LED device is highly suitable for arthritis.

Ensuring penetration to the joints

The two main things affecting tissue penetration are the wavelengths and the strength of the light hitting the skin. In practical terms, anything below the wavelength of 600nm or over the wavelength of 950nm won’t penetrate deeply. The 800-900nm range seems to be the sweet spot for optimal penetration (to the arthritic joints) and around 820nm for maximum effects on the cell. Strength of the light (aka power density / mW/cm²) also affects penetration with 50mW/cm² over a few cm² area being a good minimum. So essentially, a device with wavelengths in the 800-850nm range and greater than 50mW/cm² power density is optimal.

How to use your light for arthritis

Assuming you have a suitable light therapy device, you will want to use it directly on or near the arthritic joint, especially around the area of the pain.

  • In some cases this will have an immediate pain relief effect.
    • More severe cases will see an effect after longer-term consistent use.
  • In cases of rheumatoid arthritis, there is direct evidence that using the light over a vein (in the neck, wrist, ankle, etc.) will help reduce the associated systemic inflammatory markers
    • Thus helping to reduce pain, morning stiffness and perhaps preventing joint degeneration.
  • This same type of systemic effect would be helpful in psoriatic arthritis and some other types of arthritis
    • Whereas focusing directly on the joint would be better for osteoarthritis brought on by injury and old age.

Arthritis treatment times by device/joint

In light therapy, the dose is important, and this seems especially true in the case of arthritis. Several meta-analyses of clinical trials have highlighted this point. For more information on dose, see our dosing blog post. Knowing how long to use your therapy device for is key to getting the results you want. Here are our recommended treatment times:

Joint Session length (minutes)*
Infrared Light Device Infrared Light Mini Red Light Device Red/Infrared Combo
Hands/fingers 0.8 1.7 1.5 2.0
Jaw 1.3 3 2.2 3
Feet/toes 1.5 3 3 4
Neck 1.7 3 3 4
Lower back 4 8 7 10
Knees 5 10 9 12
Hips 6 13 11 15
Shoulder** 7 14 12 17

*The above figures are based on data from several clinical trials and meta-analyses1,8,13,15,16,17,29. The effective energy dose for each arthritic joint has been taken into account, and also the power and penetration (of the wavelengths) of each device listed above, to calculate session time. These figures are standardised but individual variance does occur in light therapy – things like hair, hair colour, fat, skin colour and other things can reduce transmission of light, meaning you may require longer sessions.

**The shoulder dosing data is not very well described in available effective studies so values above should be considered estimates based on joint depth.

Treating knee arthritis with infrared light mini
Treating knee arthritis with infrared light mini
Red/IR combo light being used on neck pain
Red/IR combo light being used on neck pain

Summary

  • Light therapy has been used successfully to treat arthritis and other types of pain for decades.
    • Light improves all types of arthritis; osteo, rheumatoid, psoriatic, juvenile, etc.
  • Red or infrared light can potentially treat the cause of the inflammation on a foundational level, improving movement and reducing disability or further degeneration.
  • Light therapy works by improving energy production in joint cells, which lowers inflammation and normalises function.
  • LEDs and lasers are the only devices that are well studied and proven to be effective.
    • Any wavelength between 600nm and 1000nm can potentially help.
    • Infrared light around the 825nm range seems best for penetration and effectiveness in arthritis.
  • A suitable device should be used for 2 to 20 minutes depending on joint. For exact times, see the table above.

 



References

  1. Low level laser therapy for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a metaanalysis. Brosseau et al. 2000.
  2. Low level laser therapy (Classes I, II and III) for treating osteoarthritis. Brosseau et al. 2004.
  3. Effect of low-level laser therapy on the expression of inflammatory mediators and on neutrophils and macrophages in acute joint inflammation. Alves et al. 2013.
  4. Can osteoarthritis be treated with light? Michael R Hamblin, 2013.
  5. Effect of low-level laser therapy (904 nm) and static stretching in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a protocol of randomised controlled trial. Ferreira de Meneses et al. 2015.
  6. Does addition of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conservative care of knee arthritis successfully postpone the need for joint replacement? Ip et al. 2015.
  7. High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Kheshie et al. 2014
  8. Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Bjordal et al. 2007.
  9. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy applied at acupuncture points in knee osteoarthritis: a randomised double-blind comparative trial. Al Rashoud et al. 2014.
  10. Effect of low-level laser therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blinded randomized clinical study. Alghadir et al. 2014.
  11. Influence of various laser therapy methods on knee joint pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Gworys et al. 2012.
  12. Efficacy of low level laser therapy associated with exercises in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind study. Alfredo et al. 2012.
  13. The effect of low-level laser in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hegedus et al. 2009.
  14. Synergic effects of ultrasound and laser on the pain relief in women with hand osteoarthritis. Paolillo et al. 2015.
  15. A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Bjordal et al. 2003.
  16. Meta-Analysis of Pain Relief Effects by Laser Irradiation on Joint Areas. Ho Jang et al. 2012.
  17. Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. Anita R Gross et al. 2013.
  18. The influence of intravenous laser irradiation of the blood on the dynamics of leptin levels and the quality of life of the patients presenting with rheumatoid arthritis. Burduli et al. 2015.
  19. Reduction of IL-20 Expression in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Linear Polarized Infrared Light Irradiation. Imaoka et al. 2014.
  20. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with ATP. Birger Carlström and Olle Lövgren. 1949.
  21. Low-level laser therapy in different stages of rheumatoid arthritis: a histological study. Alves et al. 2013.
  22. Low-level laser therapy for zymosan-induced arthritis in rats: Importance of illumination time. Castano et al. 2007.
  23. Effects of low-level laser therapy at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm in experimental model of osteoarthritis. da Rosa et al. 2012.
  24. Anti-inflammatory activities of light emitting diode irradiation on collagen-induced arthritis in mice (a secondary publication). Kuboyama et al. 2014.
  25. Photobiomodulation of pain and inflammation in microcrystalline arthropathies: experimental and clinical results. Soriano et al. 2006.
  26. Low-level laser therapy stimulates tissue repair and reduces the extracellular matrix degradation in rats with induced arthritis in the temporomandibular joint. Lemos et al. 2016.
  27. Effect of low-level laser on healing of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in rats. Peimani et al. 2014.
  28. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy on the development of osteoarthritis (OA) in a rabbit model. Oshima Y. 2011.
  29. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Chow et al. 2009.
  30. Rheumatoid arthritis and thyroid abnormalities. Staykova. 2007.
  31. Laser Ther. 2011; 20(3): 205–215. Is light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy really effective? Won-Serk Kim and R Glen Calderhead
  32. An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;89(4):616-23. Effects of low-power light therapy on wound healing: LASER x LED. Chaves ME et al., 2014.
  33. Improvement of pain and disability in elderly patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee treated with narrow-band light therapy. Stelian et al. 1992.
  34. In chronic low back pain, low level laser therapy combined with exercise is more beneficial than exercise alone in the long term: a randomised trial. Djavid et al. 2007.
  35. Laser therapy: a randomized, controlled trial of the effects of low-intensity Nd:YAG laser irradiation on musculoskeletal back pain. Basford et al. 1999.
  36. Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Cetiner et al. 2006.
  37. Lasertherapy efficacy in temporomandibular disorders: control study. Santos Tde et al. 2010.
  38. Low-power laser treatment in patients with frozen shoulder: preliminary results. Stergioulas. 2008.
  39. Exact action spectra for cellular responses relevant to phototherapy. Karu et al. 2005.
  40. Positive effects of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on Bouchard’s and Heberden’s osteoarthritis. Baltzer et al. 2016

17 thoughts on “Light Therapy Improves Arthritis Dramatically

  1. Peter Martinez says:

    Great to see more evidence that poor bioenergetics are involved in a large number of degenerative conditions like arthritis. Red light coupled with improvements in diet seems to be a great therapy! Thanks for this.

  2. Anonymous says:

    A bit off topic but not too far….
    My husband (guitarist) uses the red light on his strumming hand and arm. He has developed dystonia and it seems to help with inflammation. Have you heard of any treatment of dystonias with the red light?
    Thanks

  3. Tyler says:

    Interesting. I’m looking forward to testing out red light therapy for mitochondrial and healing stimulation.

  4. Dennis says:

    Red Light Man,

    Thanks for sharing how light therapy can improve arthritis. I’m very new to the topic of light therapy, so it’s fascinating to discover how this type of therapy can treat different illnesses.

    Dennis

  5. Julia says:

    thanks for all the tips on different applications. I think I need to just live in a red light world 24/7 to address all my issues

    • Joe says:

      There are lots of studies now on various nerve related and neurodegenerative conditions such as alzheimer’s and parkinson’s. You’ll want near-infrared rather than red if you want to try (due to the penetration) and aim for high doses.

  6. Ron Clay says:

    Thanks, Joe. Might the LED Hand Pain Reliever mitt as advertised in Hammacher-Schlemmer possibly hurt my 98 year-old Mother’s painful arthritic hands? Many thanks. Ron

    • Joe says:

      I’m not sure as I’ve never seen it. As long as it has a power density of 50mW/cm2+ and wavelengths around 750-850nm, it should be effective. I don’t know about the safety though, or if it could hurt the hands through some other mechanism.

  7. Pam Askins says:

    I had surgery to remove arthritis in my thumb. The surgeon took out bone and replace with a tendon. It has been 11 weeks since surgery now my hand is not responding to therapy due to scar tissue. I was wondering if I would be a candidate for red light therapy?

    • Joe says:

      Sure. It would have been better to begin light therapy before/after surgery rather than 11 weeks later but even now is better than nothing. It will help to reduce inflammation in that area and help stop any further scar tissue and hopefully help to remove any scar tissue that is not finalised in place yet.

  8. Ralph says:

    Hello, It would be more useful if you could recommend bulbs or lamps like this. And also make more test about the different lamps. There are so many out there and for example you did not measure any lamp for stimulate collagen: those red light (not infrared) from 600-700 and with a decent mW of output. Sadly, 99% of those for growth plants are very low on output power.
    Anyway. Please, which type of bulb is this? Thank you for the information. Good, but not great job 😉

    • Joe says:

      Hey Ralph,
      I don’t think you want to ‘stimulate collagen’ as this is usually the result of metabolic stress, leading to wrinkles, scars, fibrosis, etc. If you want healthy skin, you need healthy skin cells, not collagen production.
      What tests do you want exactly? The power density in mW/cm2 is measured for all of our light devices. If you want a recommendation for arthritis then I suggest this product:
      https://redlightman.com/product/infrared-light-device/
      I don’t think you can use a ‘bulb’ for this type of treatment, as the heat makes it impossible to get a high enough dose for deep penetration. You need an LED device or a low level laser.
      Lights for growing plants aren’t usually too low on output power, the problem is the wide beam angle makes the power density so weak, especially at distance. You want a spotlight/searchlight type narrow beam, not a wide angle grow light type beam.
      Will try to do a ‘great job’ on the next article 😛

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.